Authors

1 Government Medical College, Srinagar

2 Department Of Pediatrics, Government Medical College, Srinagar

3 Government Medical College, Jammu

4 Government Medical college,srinagar

5 Government Medical College ,Srinagar,

6 Government Medical college, srinagar

Abstract

Objective:
To estimate incidence of Reactive Thrombocytosis among febrile infants and assess utility of platelet count as a potential predictor and diagnostic tool of serious bacterial infection .
Design:
Prospective non randomized study conducted between April 2011 to March 2012
Setting: Tertiary care pediatric unit.
Inclusion criteria:
All infants 30 to 89 days of age, admitted with rectal temperature >38°C/100.4°F without apparent focus of an infection.
Exclusion criteria:
Infants having fever more than 72 hours and who had received antibiotics or vaccination within 48 hours of presentation.
Main Outcome Measures:
sepsis evaluation was done on admission. SBI included all cases of occult bacteremia, urinary tract infection, bacterial meningitis, pneumonia, bacterial gastroenteritis and infections of the soft tissues and bones.
Results:
Of the 149 infants studied, 39 (26.2%) had SBI. Platelet count was significantly higher in infants with SBI compared to those without {Platelet count ≥ 4 lakh /mm3 in SBI (84.6%) vs non SBI (542.4% ). Mean platelet count 5.1 ± 1.1 in SBI versus 3.9 ± 1.6 in non SBI which was statistically significant P

Keywords

Introduction

 Thrombocytosis   an elevation in the peripheral  blood platelet count to values more than  4 lakh/mm3 is common in infancy and childhood occurring in 3 to 13% of children(1). Thrombocytosis is of two types primary and secondary.

Primary is again divided into familial and essential. Familial has been described in number of families and appears to be heterogeneous as to underlying pathophysiological mechanism (4, 7). Essential thrombocytosis is a chronic clonal myeloproliferative disease (8-12).

 Secondary thrombocytosis also known as reactive thrombocytosis in childhood results from increased  thrombopoiesis

as a reactive process due to underlying cause (15-22).

Reactive thrombocytosis seems to affect up to 15% of hospitalized children (1, 13-17).Its more common in neonates, particularly premature ones and up to 2 years of age.

 Febrile infants less than 3 months of age present a management challenge, as many of these have no identifiable source of fever, and the prevalence of serious bacterial infection (SBI) in this age group is high (29-32). The most commonly suggested strategy is for the febrile neonates to be admitted to a hospital and undergo full sepsis work up(31-32). In the past decade, several management strategies based on the combination of physical and laboratory findings have been proposed, but no protocol has been universally adopted(33-37 ). Furthermore, a series of laboratory parameters such as white blood cell (WBC) count, absolute neutrophil count, pyuria, C reactiveprotein (CRP), and more recently ,interleukin-6 and  procalcitonin, have been extensively evaluated and compared as potential predictors of SBI(33-36).

However these laboratory tests lack adequate predictive ability and the idea of a simple, rapid and inexpensive diagnostic test that could accurately identify bacterial infections among febrile infants remains unattainable

 Methods

 We followed the cases of all  infants aged 30 to 89 days, admitted to G.B Pant Hospital associated with Government Medical college ,Srinagar a tertiary care pediatric hospital from April 2011 to March 2012 for investigation of fever (defined as rectal temperature >38°C) without a focus of infection.  Infants who had fever for more than 72hours, and had received antibiotics or vaccination were excluded.

 All patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria underwent sepsis evaluation including WBC count, platelet count, blood culture, urine microscopy and culture and CRP. Lumbar puncture for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis and culture, pleural tap for pleural fluid analysis as well as stool culture and chest radiographs, were obtained at the discretion of the attending pediatrician.

 The WBC count with differential and the platelet count were quantified using automated laboratory equipment (Sysmex KX 21 ). Blood cultures were monitored by an automated system (BacT/ALERT 3D). Urine was obtained by urethral catheterization using a sterile technique. The WBC in the urine were quantified by standard microscopic examination and expressed as WBC >5 per high power field (hpf) in centrifuged sample or >10 leucocytes/mm3 in uncentrifuged sample(47). The urine, CSF , pleural and stool cultures were monitored using standard laboratory techniques.

 Serious bacterial infection was defined as occult bacteremia, urinary tract infection (UTI) pneumonia, bacterial enteritis and infection of soft tissue or bones. Isolates such as Staphylococcus epidermidis  in the blood culture were considered contaminants unless they were isolated from more than two consecutive cultures.

 Urinary tract infection was defined as a single known pathogen on urine culture with   ≥1000 colony-forming units (cfu) /

mL of urine obtained by urethral catherization. The diagnosis of UTI is based on culture of properly collected specimen Urinalysis is helpful in providing immediate information to suspect UTI and enable initiation of treatment.  Confirmation of the diagnosis on urine culture is necessary

 Pneumonia was defined as the presence of a focal infiltrate on chest radiographs plus any of the following signs; a positive blood culture for a pathogenic organism or culture of a pathogenic organism from pleural fluid sample.

 Occult bacteremia was defined as pure growth of a single pathogenic micro-organism on blood culture of a febrile young infant without any apparent focus of infection on history and clinical examination. Probable bacteremia was defined as the growth of two or more types of bacteria. (49)

 Definite bacterial meningitis was defined as isolation of organism on CSF culture.(48). Probable bacterial meningitis was defined as abnormal CSF on analysis  with sterile CSF culture(48).Only patient with definite bacterial infection was taken as serious bacterial infection.

 Observation And  Results

 This study was conducted in the Department of Pediatrics, GB Pant hospital a tertiary care hospital for a period of one year from April 2011 to March 2012

 Total number of admissions of patients with fever without apparent source of infection admitted to hospital was180.Total number of patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria was 149.  31 patients were excluded out of 180 as 12 of these had fever for more than 72 hours, 3 had recent vaccination history, and 16 were treated with antibiotics within 48 hours of presentation.

  Out of the 149 infants which fulfilled the inclusion criteria , SBI was documented in 39 (26.2%). Of these, 16 (41.0%)

had UTI  (11 with  Escherichia coli),  8 occult bacteremia (2 with klebsiella , 3 with Methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus , 3 with Staphylococcus aureus ), 9 infants had pneumonia , and 6 were diagnosed with bacterial

meningitis (2 with E.Coli ,  2  with Group B Streptococcus and 2 with methicillin resistant Staphylococcus Aureus). One infants had   positive blood as well as urine cultures for  Esherichia coli. None of the infants had a positive stool culture there was no case of bacterial pneumonia positive for blood culture.

The remaining 110 infants (.73.8%) with negative sepsis evaluation were categorized in the non–SBI group.

 Table 1; Depicting Serious Bacterial Infection Across Diagnosis.

 

Serious Bacterial Infection across diagnosis

Percentage

 

 

Pneumonia

23.1

 

 

Meningitis

15.4

 

 

Occult Bacteremia

20.5

 

 

Urinary Tract Infection

41.0

 

 Age ,gender and residence were non-significant across  both  SBI and Non SBI groups .P value non-significant (> 0.05).Thrombocytosis ( Platelet count more than 4 lakh/mm3) was significantly higher in SBI ,33 out of 39 versus Non SBI 60 out of 110, P value <0.05, CRP and TLC was significantly high on SBI than Non SBI, P value <0.05.

Blood Culture was positive in 9 SBI patients, Urine culture 16, CSF culture in 6, CXR for pneumonia and pleural fluid analysis /culture for isolation of pathogen for pneumonia in 9.

         Table 2; comparing various variables across SBI and Non SBI

 

Variable

 

SBI

 

Non SBI

 

P-value

Temperatue°F

103 ±1.3

(101,105)

102 ±1.1

(101,105)

0.00(sig)

Hemoglobin

11.8±2.7

(9.2, 19.2)

12.0 ±2.3

(8.6, 19)

0.72(Not Sig)

Total Leucocyte count (000’s/mm3)

14,915±4998

(5900,24500)

10,948±4586

(5200,29000)

0.000(sig)

Total Platelet Count (lakh/mm3)

5.1± 1.1

(1.5 ,7.2)

 

3.9±1.6

(0.4,7.4)

0.000(sig)

           Temperature, TLC and total Platelet count was higher in SBI group than in Non SBI with P value

            Showing   mean ±1 SD .( lowest and highest variable across each investigation)            

               Table 3; showing mean platelet count  in lakh/mm3  across SBI and Non SBI

 

Pneumonia

 

4.7 lakh/m33

 

Bacterial meningitis

 

5.2 lakh/mm3

 

Occult Bacteremia

 

4.9 lakh/mm3

 

UTI

 

5.3lakh/mm3

 

Non -SBI

 

3.9 lakh/mm3

 

 Table4; Depicting investigations across SBI And Non SBI                             

 

Investigation

 

SBI%

 

Non SBI%

Thrombocytosis >4 lakh/mm3

 84.6

54.5

CRP(≥2mg/dl)

51.3

13.6

Total Leucocyte Count(≥15,000/mm3)

51.3

21.8

Urine examination for pus cells(>5/HPF)

 

64.1

 

5.5

Platelet count≥ 4.5 lakh/mm3

82.1

30.0

 Table 5;  Test  characteristics for differential platelet count threshold

 

Platelets in lakh/mm3

 

 

 

N(39)

 

 

Sensitivity

%

 

 

Specificity

    %

 

 

PPV%

 

 

NPV%

 

 

Accuracy %

 

 

OR %

 

≥4.0 lakh/mm3

 

33

 

84.6

 

45.5

 

35.5

 

89.3

 

55.7

 

4.6

 

≥4.5 Lakh/mm3

 

32

 

82.1

 

70

 

49.2

 

91.7

 

73.2

 

10.7

 

≥5.0 lakh/mm3

 

20

 

53.8

 

70.0

 

38.9

 

81.1

 

65.8

 

2.7

 

≥6.0 lakh/mm3

 

8

 

20.5

 

90.0

 

42.1

 

76.2

 

71.8

 

2.3

SBI: serious bacterial infection; PPV: positive predictive value; NPV: negative  predictive value;

According to test characteristics for different platelet count thresholds we came to know that platelet count of≥ 4.5 lakh/mm3 carried best accuracy of 73.2 %, odds ratio of 10.7, sensitivity 82.1%, specificity 70% ,NPV 91.7% and PPV 49.2% than any other platelet threshold, so the platelet count of ≥4.5 lakh/mm3 had a differential tendency to pick up the maximum patients out of SBI and lesser patients out of Non SBI.

Table 6; Depicting combined high risk criterion of TLC,Pyuria,CRP and Platelet count in early prediction of patients of SBI.

 

 

Variable

 

 

N(39)

 

 

Sensitivity %

 

 

Specificity %

 

 

PPV %

 

 

NPV%

 

 

OR

 

TLC

 

20

 

51.3

 

78.2

 

45.5

 

81.9

 

3.8

 

Pyuria ≥5 wbc/hpf

 

25

 

64.1

 

94.5

 

80.6

 

8.1

 

30.9

 

CRP

 

20

 

51.3

 

86.4

 

57.1

 

83.3

 

6.7

 

Plt Count(≥4.5 lakh/mm3)

 

32

 

82.1

 

70.0

 

49.2

 

91.7

 

10.7

 

TLC+Pyuria

 

32

 

82.1

 

76.4

 

55.2

 

92.3

 

14.8

 

TLC+Pyuria+CRP

 

35

 

89.7

 

68.2

 

50.0

 

94.9

 

18.7

 

TLC+Pyuria+CRP+Platelet(≥4.5 lakh/mm3)

 

 

 

37

 

 

94.9

 

 

53.6

 

 

42.0

 

 

96.7

 

 

21.4

PLT: platelet count; CRP: C-reactive protein; hpf: high power field, PPV: positive predictive value; NPV: negative predictive value;

A combined high-risk criterion of two tests (15,000/mm3 for WBC  and ≥5WBC/hpf of pyuria,  led the misclassification of  17.9 % of the SBIs (7  infants ), while 26 infants were falsely  classified as high-risk   out of non SBI.

Further  combination of  WBC ≥15000 /mm3,  pyuria≥10 WBC /hpf, and CRP ≥2 mg/dl, led to the misclassification of 4 infants with SBI  (10.2%  of SBI),  whereas  35 infants  without bacterial infection  were falsely classified as high-risk .

The addition of platelet count of ≥   4.5 lakh/mm3  to the above combination of three tests  resulted in misclassification of only 2 SBI infants  (5.1%)  with improvement of picking up 2 more patients with SBI over the combination of three tests , with final pick up of 37 out of 39 SBI patients thus the combination of four tests may help in early prediction of serious bacterial infection in febrile young patients  .

 Depicting  Receiver Operating characteristics curves(ROC) for PLT,WBC,CRP, and Pyuria  predicting serious bacterial infection in febrile young infants.

  Receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC)  was plotted for   platelet (PLT),  WBC,  C-reactive  protein (CRP ) and pyuria   predicting serious bacterial   infection in febrile young  infants.  Area under the  curve (AUC) for  PLT  was   0.760 ; for    WBC  0.64;  for  CRP  0.688  and for  pyuria  was  0.793. The  AUC  for  WBC was significantly   lower compared to  the AUC    for  pyuria (P<  0.05). No    statistically significant differences were found   between  the  AUCs  of the other parameters, thus PLT with 0.760 AUC carry moderate ability in predicting patients with SBI.

  Discussion

This study was conducted in Department of Pediatrics, G.B Pant hospital, a referral tertiary care hospital associated with Government Medical College ,for children of Kashmir valley. The study was conducted from April 2011 to March 2012. Total number of admissions during period was 25640 .Total number of patients with fever without apparent focus of infection on history and clinical examination, admitted during this period was 180.Finally total number of patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria was  149 . The purpose of this study was, to estimate the incidence of reactive thrombocytosis among febrile young patients and to assess the utility of platelet count as a potential predictor of serious bacterial infection..

The prevalence of SBI in our population   was 26.2% ( 39 out of 149 patients were positive for SBI). Since the study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital, to which more sick patients are referred ,it can be the reason for high prevalence of SBI in our study.

In this study, platelet count was significantly higher in febrile infants with documented bacterial infection, particularly in those with UTI, occult bacteremia and pneumonia. However, due to a substantial overlap, it was difficult to identify threshold value that could clearly differentiate infants with SBI   from other febrile infants. Platelet   counts of ≥450,000/mm3 had the highest accuracy (73.2%)   in differentiating infants with SBI, with less false

negative   and false positive results. The overall   ability of platelet count to identify infants with SBI was moderate (AUC 0.76), but comparable to the other parameters.

 The fact that platelets can behave like an acute phase reactant is well recognized. Stimulation of platelet production is triggered by interleukin-6 which enhances megakaryopoiesis   directly and indirectly by stimulating hepatic thrombopoietin   production .

In this study,   platelet count was significantly higher in infants with SBI compared to those without, and this was

So, reactive thrombocytosis in combination with WBC, CRP and pyuria seems to be a useful tool in predicting early the risk of SBI in young  febrile  patients . Hence ,thrombocytosis in febrile young infants could be used as a quick inexpensive diagnostic tool for predicting SBI .

 

 

 
 1.  Sutor AH. Thrombocytosis in childhood. Semin Thromb Hemost1995; 21: 330     339.
 2.  Kaushansky  K.  Thrombopoietin:  the primary  regulator of platelet  Production. Blood 1995; 86:419-43 1.
 3. Ishiguro A, Suzuki Y, Mito M, Shimbo T, Matsubara K, Kato T, et al. Elevation of serum thrombopoietin precedes thrombocytosis in acute infections. Br J Haematol 2002; 116: 612-618.
 4. Fujiwara T, Harigae H, Kameoka J, Yokoyama H,Takahashi S, Tomiya Y, et al. A case of familial thrombocytosis: possible role of altered
 thrombopoietin production. Am J Hematol 2004; 76: 395-397.
 5. Kikuchi M, Tayama T, Hayakawa H, Takahashi I, Hoshino H, Ohsaka A. Familial thrombocytosis.Br J Haematol 1995; 89:900-902.
 6. Williams EC,  Shahidi NT. Benign familial thrombocytosis. Am J Hematol 1991; 37: 124-125.
7. Fernandez-Robles E, Vermylen C, Martiat P,Ninane J, Cornu G. Familial essential thrombocythemia.Pediatr Hematol Oncol 1990; 7: 373-376.
 8.  Hasle H.Incidence of essential thrombocythemia in children. Br J Haematol 2000; 110: 751.
 9.  Yang RC Qian LS. Essential thrombocythaemia in children: a report of  nine cases. Br J Haemato12000; 110: 1009       1010.
I0.Papageorgiou T. Theodoridou A. Kourti M,Nikolaidou S, Athanassiadou F,KaloutsiV.Childhood essential thrombocytosis. Pediatr BloodCancer 2006; 47: 970- 971.
11.Dror Y, Blanchette V S. Essential thrombocythaemia in children . Br J Haematol 1999 ; 107: 691 - 698.
 12.Dror Y, Zipursky A, Blanchette VS. Essential thrombocythemia in  children. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 1999; 21: 356 363.
13.Yohannan MD, Higgy KE, al-Mashhadani SA, Santhosh KumarCR. Thrombocytosis Etiologic analysis of 663 patients. Clin Pediatr 1.994; 33: 340 - 343.
 14.Denton A, Davis P . Extreme thrombocytosis in admissions to paediatric intensive care: no requirement for treatment. Arch Dis Child, 2007; 92: 515- 516.
 15.Dame C, Sutor AH. Primary and secondary thrombocytosis in Childhood . Br J Haematol 2005; 129: 165- 177.
 16.Heng J T,Tan AM . Thrombocytosis in childhood . Singapore Med J 1998;39:485- 487.
 17.Vora AJ, Lilleyman JS. Secondary  thrombocytosis . Arch Dis Child 1993; 68: 88- 90.
  18.Garoufi A,Voutsioti K,Tsapra H, Karpathios T Zeis PM. Reactive thrombocytosis in children with upper urinary tract infections . Acta Paediat 2001; 90: 448-449