Too Close to Focus? Neural Evidence of Altered Auditory Spatial Attention in Autism

Document Type : original article

Authors

1 Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.

2 Data Science and AI, Computer Science and Engineering Department, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Suceava, Romania.

3 Data Science and AI, Computer Science and Engineering Department, Chalmers University of Technology.

4 Data Science and AI, Computer Science and Engineering Department, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

5 Autism and Related Neurodevelopmental Disorders Research Team, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

6 Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.

Abstract

Background: Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) often display unusual auditory processing. However, intensity-based auditory spatial attention has been less studied in children with autism. Since attention to the source of sound is crucial for communication and learning in these children, it is necessary to investigate this aspect of auditory attention in this population.
Methods: Event-related potentials (ERP) data were recorded from 12 high-functioning boys with ASD and 15 age-matched typically developing (TD) boys (ages 7–12) while passively listening to short Romanian sentences presented at three simulated distances (0.5 m, 1 m, 2 m). Stimuli were normalized and their intensity (65, 59, and 53 dB SPL) was adjusted to simulate depth. The P300 component of ERPs was extracted and analyzed for amplitude and latency using Python and SPSS. Statistical analyses included MANOVA and follow-up ANOVAs.
Results: No significant multivariate effects of group were observed at any distance. However, in univariate between-group analyses at 0.5 m, the ASD group showed significantly shorter P300 latencies compared to the TD group (p = 0.046, partial η² = 0.150). The differences at 1 m and 2 m were not statistically significant.
Conclusions: Children with ASD exhibited altered neural responses to nearby speech stimuli, indicating atypical auditory spatial processing and potentially increased cognitive demands during close-distance speech perception. These results align with theories of social attention and impaired sensory processing in autism.

Keywords

References

  1. Hirota T, King BH. Autism spectrum disorder: a review. Jama. 2023 Jan 10;329(2):157-68.
  2. Dawson G, Toth K. Autism spectrum disorders. Developmental psychopathology: volume three: risk, disorder, and adaptation. 2015 Sep 5:317-57.
  3. Zwaigenbaum L, Bryson S, Rogers T, Roberts W, Brian J, Szatmari P. Behavioral manifestations of autism in the first year of life. International journal of developmental neuroscience. 2005 Apr 1;23(2-3):143-52.
  4. Franchini M, Glaser B, Wood de Wilde H, Gentaz E, Eliez S, Schaer M. Social orienting and joint attention in preschoolers with autism spectrum disorders. PloS one. 2017 Jun 9;12(6):e0178859.
  5. Goncalves AM, Monteiro P. Autism Spectrum Disorder and auditory sensory alterations: a systematic review on the integrity of cognitive and neuronal functions related to auditory processing. Journal of neural transmission. 2023 Mar;130(3):325-408.
  6. Mundy P, Neal AR. Neural plasticity, joint attention, and a transactional social-orienting model of autism. InInternational review of research in mental retardation 2000 Jan 1 (Vol. 23, pp. 139-168). Academic Press.
  7. Chevallier C, Kohls G, Troiani V, Brodkin ES, Schultz RT. The social motivation theory of autism. Trends in cognitive sciences. 2012 Apr 1;16(4):231-9.
  8. King AJ. Visual influences on auditory spatial learning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2009 Feb 12;364(1515):331-9.
  9. Voss P. Auditory spatial perception without vision. Frontiers in psychology. 2016 Dec 20;7:1960.
  10. Lin IF, Shirama A, Kato N, Kashino M. The singular nature of auditory and visual scene analysis in autism. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2017 Feb 19;372(1714):20160115.
  11. Teder-Sälejärvi WA, Pierce KL, Courchesne E, Hillyard SA. Auditory spatial localization and attention deficits in autistic adults. Cognitive Brain Research. 2005 May 1;23(2-3):221-34.
  12. Mihai AS, Geman O, Toderean R, Miron L, SharghiLavan S. The Next Frontier in Brain Monitoring: A Comprehensive Look at In-Ear EEG Electrodes and Their Applications. Sensors. 2025 May 25;25(11):3321.
  13. Jeste SS, Nelson III CA. Event related potentials in the understanding of autism spectrum disorders: an analytical review. Journal of autism and developmental disorders. 2009 Mar;39(3):495-510.
  14. Cotter M, Reisli S, Francisco AA, Wakim KM, Oakes L, Crosse MJ, et al. Neurophysiological measures of auditory sensory processing are associated with adaptive behavior in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders. 2023 Apr 1;15(1):11.
  15. Joos K, Gilles A, Van de Heyning P, De Ridder D, Vanneste S. From sensation to percept: the neural signature of auditory event-related potentials. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2014 May 1;42:148-56.
  16. Polich J. Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical neurophysiology. 2007 Oct 1;118(10):2128-48.
  17. Didoné DD, Oppitz SJ, Gonçalves MS, Garcia MV. Long-latency auditory evoked potentials: Normalization of protocol applied to normal adults. Arch Otolaryngol Rhinol. 2019;5(03):69-73.
  18. Luck SJ. Event-related potentials.2012.
  19. Raggi A, Serretti A, Ferri R. The P300 component of the auditory event-related potential in adult psychiatric and neurologic disorders: a narrative review of clinical and experimental evidence. International Clinical Psychopharmacology. 2024:10-97.
  20. Lord C, Rutter M, Le Couteur A. Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised: a revised version of a diagnostic interview for caregivers of individuals with possible pervasive developmental disorders. Journal of autism and developmental disorders. 1994 Oct;24(5):659-85.
  21. World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Bulletin of the world health organization. 2003 Jul 2;79(4):373.
  22. Pearsons KS, Bennett RL, Fidell SA. Speech levels in various noise environments. Office of Health and Ecological Effects, Office of Research and Development, US EPA; 1977.
  23. Martinis M, Ozimec Z. Application of Gauss' Law in Acoustics. arXiv preprint arXiv:1104.0893. 2011 Apr 5.
  24. Barry RJ, De Blasio FM, Rushby JA, MacDonald B, Fogarty JS, Cave AE. Stimulus intensity effects and sequential processing in the passive auditory ERP. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 2022 Jun 1;176:149-63.
  25. OpenBCI. The complete headset (EEG) [Internet]. [cited 2024 Oct 30]. Available from: https://shop.openbci.com/products/the-complete-headset-eeg
  26. SharghiLavan S, Geman O, Toderean R. Speech Perception and Speech Attention: A Case Study Based on Event-Related Potential Using the OpenBCI System. In2024 E-Health and Bioengineering Conference (EHB) 2024 Nov 14 (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
  27. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. routledge; 2013 May 13.
  28. Haesen B, Boets B, Wagemans J. A review of behavioural and electrophysiological studies on auditory processing and speech perception in autism spectrum disorders. Research in autism spectrum disorders. 2011 Apr 1;5(2):701-14.
  29. Happé F. The weak central coherence account of autism. Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders. 2005 Apr 15;1:640-9.
  30. Key AP, D'Ambrose Slaboch K. Speech processing in autism spectrum disorder: an integrative review of auditory neurophysiology findings. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 2021 Nov 8;64(11):4192-212.
  31. Khalfa S, Bruneau N, Rogé B, Georgieff N, Veuillet E, Adrien JL, et al. Increased perception of loudness in autism. Hearing research. 2004 Dec 1;198(1-2):87-92.
Journal of Pediatric Perspectives
Volume 13, Issue 8
August 2025
Pages 19618-19627

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics