Journal of Pediatric Perspectives

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

FAQ

Peer Review Process

News

The Effects of an Educational Program Based on Social Cognitive Theory in Adopting Behaviors to Prevent Excessive Consumption of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages in Children: Application of Shad Social Network Software

Document Type : original article

Authors

1 health education & health promotion , School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

2 department of clinical nutrition,faculty of nutrition & food sciences. isfahan university of medical sciences

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

4 professor, Department of Health Education and Promotion, Faculty of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Abstract

Background: Excessive consumption of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages (SSBs) is a health problem in most societies today, which has adverse consequences in health, social and economic areas. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the application of social cognitive theory (SCT) in the design and evaluation of an educational intervention in order to adopt behaviors to prevent excessive consumption of SSBs in students.
Methods: The current research was a quasi-experimental study. Using multistage sampling, 100 Junior High-school students in Urmia, Iran in 2021 were selected and assigned to two groups, namely intervention (n=100) and control (n=100). To collect the study data, the researchers utilized a researcher-made questionnaire including items about demographic information and SCT constructs such as awareness, outcome expectations, self-regulation, self-efficacy, social support , barriers and Preventive behaviors, which was completed in two stages before and three months after the last training session; the data were analyzed using the SPSS software version 25.0.
Results: The mean age of the participants in the intervention and control groups was 13.71 ± 0.71 and 13.84 ± 0.81, respectively. Before the intervention, the mean scores of social cognitive theory structures and desired behavior were not significantly different between the two groups. But three months after the intervention, the mean scores of knowledge constructs, outcome expectations, self-regulation, self-efficacy, social support, perceived barriers, and desirable student behavior showed a significant difference between the two groups (P<0.001).
Conclusion: The results of the study revealed that social cognitive theory can be used as a theoretical basis for designing and evaluating interventions to encourage people to follow a proper diet and reduce the consumption of SSBs.

Keywords

References
  1. French SA, Lin B-H, Guthrie JF. National trends in soft drink consumption among children and adolescents aged 6 to 17 years: prevalence, amounts, and sources, 1977/1978 to 1994/1998. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 2003; 103(10):1326-31.
  2. Karimi M, Zare Haroftah F, Baghianimoghadam MH, Bahrevar V, Ghiyasi H. Prediction of the Students’ Intention to the Consumption of Soft Drinks: Using the Extended Parallel Process Model. Journal of Health Sciences & Surveillance System. 2017; 5(2):94-9.
  3. Vartanian LR, Schwartz MB, Brownell KD. Effects of soft drink consumption on nutrition and health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. American journal of public health. 2007; 97(4):667-75.
  4. Wang YC, Bleich SN, Gortmaker SL. Increasing caloric contribution from sugar-sweetened beverages and 100% fruit juices among US children and adolescents, 1988–2004. Pediatrics. 2008; 121(6):e1604-e14.
  5. Dehdari T, Mergen T. A survey of factors associated with soft drink consumption among secondary school students in Farooj city, 2010. Journal of Jahrom University of Medical Sciences. 2012; 9(4):33-9.
  6. Bowen KJ, Sullivan VK, Kris-Etherton PM, Petersen KS. Nutrition and cardiovascular disease—an update. Current atherosclerosis reports. 2018; 20(2):1-11.
  7. Bleich SN, Vercammen KA. The negative impact of sugar-sweetened beverages on children’s health: an update of the literature. BMC obesity. 2018; 5(1):1-27.
  8. Europe E. Reducing the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and their negative health impact in Estonia. Copenhagen: World Health Organization. 2017.
  9. Organization WH. Guideline: sugars intake for adults and children: World Health Organization; 2015.
  10. Eck KM, Dinesen A, Garcia E, Delaney CL, Famodu OA, Olfert MD, Byrd-Bredbenner C, Shelnutt KP. “Your body feels better when you drink water”: parent and school-age children’s sugar-sweetened beverage cognitions. Nutrients. 2018; 10(9):1232.
  11. Bere E, Glomnes ES, te Velde SJ, Klepp K-I. Determinants of adolescents’ soft drink consumption. Public health nutrition. 2008; 11(1):49-56.
  12. Hagger M, Weed M. DEBATE: do behavioral interventions work in the real world. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019; 16:36.
  13. Nutbeam D, Harris E, Wise W. Theory in a nutshell: a practical guide to health promotion theories: McGraw-Hill; 2010.
  14. Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K. Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice: John Wiley & Sons; 2008.
  15. Gaines A, Turner LW. Improving Fruit and Vegetable Intake among Children. Californian Journal of Health Promotion. 2009; 7(1):52-66.
  16. Kolopaking R. Use of the Self-Regulatory Approach to Develop and Evaluate the Nutrition Education Effectiveness: Jakarta: University of Indonesia; 2010.
  17. Nixon C, Moore H, Douthwaite W, Gibson E, Vogele C, Kreichauf S, Wildgruber A, Manios Y, Summerbell CD, ToyBox-study group. Identifying effective behavioural models and behaviour change strategies underpinning preschool‐and school‐based obesity prevention interventions aimed at 4–6‐year‐olds: a systematic review. Obesity reviews. 2012; 13:106-17.
  18. Mazarello Paes V, Hesketh K, O'Malley C, Moore H, Summerbell C, Griffin S, et al. Determinants of sugar‐sweetened beverage consumption in young children: a systematic review. Obesity reviews. 2015; 16(11):903-13.
  19. Choudhary SR, Momin MIH, Kantharia S. Facebook and WhatsApp: Beneficial or harmful. Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare. 2015; 2(17):2306-11.
  20. Ahad AD, Lim SMA. Convenience or nuisance? The ‘WhatsApp’dilemma. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014; 155:189-96.
  21. Susilo A, editor Exploring Facebook and WhatsApp as supporting social network applications for English learning in higher education2014: Conference On Professional Development In Education (PDE2014), Widyatama.
  22. Winnie W, Cheung K. A feasibility study of a WhatsApp-delivered transtheoretical model-based intervention to promote healthy eating knowledge and habits for firefighters in Hong Kong: A cluster randomized controlled trial. 2020.
  23. Inauen J, Bolger N, Shrout PE, Stadler G, Amrein M, Rackow P, Scholz U. Using smartphone‐based support groups to promote healthy eating in daily life: A randomized trial. Applied Psychology: Health and Well‐Being. 2017; 9(3):303-23.
  24. Leme ACB, Lubans DR, Guerra PH, Dewar D, Toassa EC, Philippi ST. Preventing obesity among Brazilian adolescent girls: six-month outcomes of the Healthy Habits, Healthy Girls–Brazil school-based randomized controlled trial. Preventive medicine. 2016; 8 6:77-83.
  25. Knol LL, Myers HH, Black S, Robinson D, Awololo Y, Clark D, Parker CL, Douglas JW, Higginbotham JC. Development and feasibility of a childhood obesity prevention program for rural families: Application of the social cognitive theory. American journal of health education. 2016; 47(4):204-14.
  26. Poddar KH, Hosig KW, Anderson ES, Nickols-Richardson SM, Duncan SE. Web-based nutrition education intervention improves self-efficacy and self-regulation related to increase dairy intake in college students. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 2010; 110(11):1723-7.
  27. Poddar KH, Hosig KW, Anderson-Bill ES, Nickols-Richardson SM, Duncan SE. Dairy intake and related self-regulation improved in college students using online nutrition education. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. 2012; 112(12):1976-86.
  28. Poddar KH. Using social cognitive theory to improve intake of dairy products by college students: Virginia Tech; 2009.
  29. Blomain D. Social cognitive theory and nutrition behavior: Effects of an introductory nutrition course intervention among college students: Drexel University; 2016.
  30. Hoppe CS. Sugar sweetened beverage consumption and behavioral correlates in a pilot study of high school students in Austin, Texas. 2012.
  31. Heeman VG. A Social Cognitive Model of Parental Nutritional Communication and Parental Perceptions of Preschoolers’ Eating-Related Attitudes and Behaviors: Kent State University; 2016.
  32. Sharafkhani N, Heidari Z, Paknahad Z, Mostafavi F. Psychological determinants of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages consumption among Secondary School Students: An Integrated Application of Social Cognitive Theory and Perceived Barriers Structure. International Journal of Pediatrics. 2020.
  33. Rinderknecht K, Smith C. Social cognitive theory in an after-school nutrition intervention for urban Native American youth. Journal of nutrition education and behavior. 2004; 36(6):298-304.
  34. Ahmadi Z, Pirzadeh A, Hasanzadeh A, Mostafavi F. The effect of a social cognitive theory-based intervention on fast food consumption among students. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences. 2018; 12(2).
  35. Healthy Hidayanty M, Saptawati Bardosono M, Rita Damayanti M. A social cognitive theory-based programme for eating patterns and sedentary activity among overweight adolescents in Makassar, South Sulawesi: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition. 2016; 25:S83.
  36. Penaranda E, Modave F, Diaz M. A social cognitive theory: Perspective of the sugary drink cup size policy. The Open Obesity Journal. 2014; 6(1).
  37. Anderson ES, Winett RA, Wojcik JR. Self-regulation, self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and social support: social cognitive theory and nutrition behavior. Annals of behavioral medicine. 2007; 34(3):304-12.
  38. Ball K, McNaughton SA, Mhurchu CN, Andrianopoulos N, Inglis V, McNeilly B, Le HND, Leslie D, Pollard C, Crawford D. Supermarket Healthy Eating for Life (SHELf): protocol of a randomized controlled trial promoting healthy food and beverage consumption through price reduction and skill-building strategies. BMC Public Health. 2011; 11(1):1-11.
  39. Su AY-L. Factors influencing the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages by Taiwanese hospitality students. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management. 2012; 21(3):295-310.
  40. Bashirian S, Jalili M, Karimi-Shahanjarini A, Soltanian A, Barati M. Effectiveness of educational programs based on social cognitive theory constructs to promote nutritional behaviors among pregnant women in Tabriz. Iranian Journal of Nutrition Sciences & Food Technology. 2017; 12(3):1-10.
  41. Steptoe A, Perkins-Porras L, Rink E, Hilton S, Cappuccio FP. Psychological and social predictors of changes in fruit and vegetable consumption over 12 months following behavioral and nutrition education counseling. Health Psychology. 2004; 23(6):574.
  42. Baranowski T, Watson K, Missaghian M, Broadfoot A, Cullen K, Nicklas T, Fisher J, Baranowski J, O'Donnell S. Social support is a primary influence on home fruit, 100% juice, and vegetable availability. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 2008; 108(7):1231-5.
  43. Teng NIMF, Sulong AS. The facilitators and barriers to reduce sugar sweetened beverages intake among overweight females. Healthscope: The Official Research Book of Faculty of Health Sciences, UiTM. 2019; 2.

 

Journal of Pediatric Perspectives
Volume 10, Issue 6
June 2022
Pages 16182-16194
Files
Share
How to cite
Statistics